Case 1301399/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301399/2023
- Decision date
- 10 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell Note
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing heard in public on 10 August 2023 before Employment Judge Gaskell. The judgment records that the respondent name was amended from The Priory Group to Partnerships in Care (Beverley) Limited. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim for want of jurisdiction under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also struck out the claimant's protected disclosure detriment claim and unpaid wages claim under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, on the basis that each had no reasonable prospect of success. The written record states that all of the claimant's claims were accordingly dismissed.
The judgment was given orally at the hearing, and the note states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Claim for constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim for protected disclosure detriment was struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages was struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.