Case 1301407/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Mr. Lincoln Bhebe, Director — 2020
- Case reference
- 1301407/2021
- Decision date
- 30 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked as a support worker for Rockford’s 24/7 Limited from 12 February 2019 until 14 March 2021. Her contract provided for a three-day rota with two overnight sleep-ins, with pay stated as £9 per hour and £40 per sleep-in. The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s complaint was a shortfall in holiday pay/unlawful deductions at termination, based on the respondent’s failure to pay her for seven sleep-ins.
The tribunal found that sleep-ins formed part of the claimant’s usual remuneration and holiday pay. It relied on the contract terms, the expected rota pattern, and the evidence that the claimant had been paid sleep-in payments when on annual leave, including on the October 2020 payslip. The tribunal also noted that there was no evidence that the claimant had been told she was not to receive sleep-in payments as part of her holiday pay.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claimant was entitled to outstanding holiday pay at termination including seven sleep-ins and that the respondent had not paid it. It awarded £280 gross, being £40 for each of the seven unpaid sleep-ins. The tribunal rejected the additional sums claimed for postage and for loss of earnings to attend the hearing, and no preparation time order was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was pleaded as a shortfall in holiday pay at termination and was treated by the tribunal as an unlawful deductions claim. | Upheld | — | £280 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £280
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
- s.24(2) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.