Case 1301409/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Nizniowski v TLP Haulage Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301409/2023
- Decision date
- 9 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Nizniowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 10 January 2023 and served on the respondent at its correct address on 16 January 2023. The respondent had corresponded with the Tribunal but did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Camp Date determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 19 June 2023 was cancelled.
On the material before the Tribunal, the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages totalling £1,965, had failed to pay £725 for holiday entitlement, and had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars. For that last failure, the Tribunal ordered payment of 2 weeks' wages, assessed at £290. The Tribunal also stated that the claimant was not entitled to compensation for costs of seeking advice and assistance, or for moral damage and stress. The total amount payable was £2,980.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages totalling £1,965. | Upheld | — | £1,965 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant for holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £725. | Upheld | — | £725 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to provide a statement of employment particulars; the tribunal ordered payment of 2 weeks' wages (£290). | Upheld | — | £290 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,980
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.