Case 1301436/2023 · Employment Tribunal
XYZ v Birmingham City Council FINAL HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 1301436/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Members
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr R Virdee, Mr R Spry-Shute
Parties
2 namedClaimant
XYZ
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent at Birmingham on 10 May 2024. The tribunal recorded that all complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal under rules 51 and 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure, except for a number of specified claims that were expressly carved out of the dismissal order.
The dismissed complaints were the direct age discrimination complaints numbered 15 and 17 to 24, the direct disability discrimination complaints numbered 28, 31, 34 and 37, and the whistleblowing complaints numbered 39, 40, 41 and 43. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the merits of those complaints; it records only that they were dismissed following withdrawal.
The judgment also records that a constructive unfair dismissal complaint under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 remained live, together with specified age-related harassment and age discrimination complaints, specified disability discrimination and harassment complaints, victimisation complaints, section 15 disability complaints, reasonable-adjustments complaints, and the holiday pay and unlawful deductions claim. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rules 51 and 52. This entry covers complaint numbers 15 and 17 to 24; complaint numbers 9 to 14, 16 and 20 were carved out of the dismissal order and remained live. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rules 51 and 52. This entry covers complaint numbers 28, 31, 34 and 37; complaint numbers 1 to 8, 25 to 27, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35 and 36 were carved out of the dismissal order and remained live. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rules 51 and 52. This entry covers complaint numbers 39, 40, 41 and 43; complaint numbers 38 and 42 were carved out of the dismissal order and remained live. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.