Case 1301457/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Marshall v Executive Carers Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1301457/2021
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mensah Date
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Marshall gave oral evidence at the remote Birmingham hearing on 30 June 2023 and confirmed that the correct employer was Executive Carers Limited, identified on her last two payslips, rather than Executive Care Agency Limited, which was in creditors' voluntary liquidation. The Tribunal noted that both companies had been registered at the same address until the latter went into liquidation.
The claim was dismissed solely because the claimant had already secured a county court judgment, numbered 351MC890 and dated 08.02.2023, for the identical claim and identical claimed loss against Executive Carers Limited. The judgment does not record any separate monetary award in the employment tribunal proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive legal label for the claim. It states only that the claim was dismissed because the claimant had already obtained a county court judgment dated 08.02.2023 for the identical claim and identical claimed loss against the same respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.