Case 1301469/2023 · Employment Tribunal
MS EMILY PETTS v Alice (Relief of Poverty and Advancement of Community) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301469/2023
- Decision date
- 23 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N. Clarke
- Venue
- CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MS EMILY PETTS
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge N. Clarke sitting alone at a CVP hearing on 22 and 23 June 2023. The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim.
The tribunal upheld the wrongful dismissal claim and assessed damages at £3,220. It also upheld the claim for a defective written statement of Employment Particulars and assessed damages at £1,076. The judgment does not set out any separate basic award, interest, or other remedy components, so the bottom-line monetary figure recorded is £4,296.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Judgment states that the wrongful dismissal claim succeeded and damages were assessed at £3,220. | Upheld | — | £3,220 |
| Other | Judgment records a claim for a defective written statement of Employment Particulars and assesses damages at £1,076. | Upheld | — | £1,076 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,296
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.