Case 1301488/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person v DelivrMe Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1301488/2022
- Decision date
- 26 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham by CVP on 26 October 2022 before Employment Judge Broughton. The claimants, Ms C Hulber and Ms A Parkes, appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal recorded that the claimants' claims of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay succeeded.
The written judgment set out separate awards for each claimant. Ms Hulber was awarded £6,249.99 for unpaid wages, calculated as three months at £2,083.33, and £381.00 for unpaid holiday pay, giving a total of £6,630.99. Ms Parkes was awarded £4,822.80 for unpaid wages, calculated as three months at £1,607.60, and £260.88 for unpaid holiday pay, giving a total of £5,083.68. The combined award was £11,714.67.
The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further findings or legal analysis are set out in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded claims for unpaid wages and awarded Ms Hulber £6,249.99 and Ms Parkes £4,822.80 for unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £11,073 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded claims for unpaid holiday pay and awarded Ms Hulber £381.00 and Ms Parkes £260.88 for unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £642 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,715
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.