Case 1301501/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Shenton v OPH Telford Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301501/2023
- Decision date
- 27 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J. Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Shenton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment in default under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time limit. The decision was made by Employment Judge J. Jones on 27 September 2023.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £127.47 gross. It also upheld the claim for failure to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £13.47 gross.
In addition, the tribunal made a declaration only that the respondent had failed to give the claimant itemised pay statements in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No separate monetary award was made for that declaration. The total sum payable by the respondent was £140.94.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £127 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £13 |
| Other | Declaration only that the respondent failed to give itemised pay statements in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £141
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.