Case 1301516/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ian Morgan v Exact Mortgage Experts Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301516/2022
- Decision date
- 17 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coghlin KC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ian Morgan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 17 March 2023 before Employment Judge Coghlin KC sitting alone, the claimant did not appear and the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend his claim.
The tribunal then dismissed the claimant's claims. It found that they had been presented outside the time limit in section 123 of the Equality Act 2010 and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's application to amend his claim was refused. The claim was dismissed because it was presented outside the section 123 Equality Act 2010 time limit and the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.