Case 1301521/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Alderson v Synpower Merchant Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301521/2022
- Decision date
- 27 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Alderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing, but it had emailed the tribunal on 27 November 2023 confirming that it would adhere to the hearing outcome and settle as set out by the tribunal, so the matter proceeded in its absence. The claimant had previously withdrawn his unfair dismissal claim by email dated 21 July 2022, and the tribunal recorded that claim as dismissed upon withdrawal.
The claimant also withdrew his notice pay claim by email dated 22 November 2023 and said he intended to pursue notice pay in the civil courts. The tribunal treated that as a withdrawal under Rule 51 but did not dismiss the claim, because it was satisfied there was a legitimate reason for the claimant to reserve the right to bring a further claim, as contemplated by Rule 52.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. It found an unauthorised deduction in respect of the period 1 to 15 October 2021, payable on or around 31 October 2021, and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted, £3,593.61. The calculation was based on an annual salary of £75,000 and a monthly car allowance of £828.33, producing weekly rates of £1,442.31 for salary and £191.15 for car allowance.
The holiday pay claim was also well-founded. The tribunal found that the claimant had accrued 28 days' leave by the termination date, had taken 15.5 days, and therefore had 12.5 days of accrued but untaken leave, equal to 2.5 weeks. Applying the weekly rate of £1,633.46, it awarded £4,083.65 gross under regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal also determined that the claimant was entitled to statutory redundancy pay of £2,448, which had not yet been paid.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn by email dated 21 July 2022; the tribunal recorded the claim as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim withdrawn by email dated 22 November 2023. The claimant said he intended to pursue notice pay in the civil courts, and the tribunal did not dismiss the claim because it accepted there was a legitimate reason to reserve that right under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 15 October 2021, payable on or around 31 October 2021. | Upheld | — | £3,594 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim under regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998; the tribunal calculated 12.5 days of accrued but untaken leave, equal to 2.5 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £4,084 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £2,448 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,125
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 51 Employment Tribunal Rules
- Rule 52 Employment Tribunal Rules
- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.