Case 1301530/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stephen Stamper v Datastor Systems Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1301530/2021
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hena Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stephen Stamper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment in an unfair dismissal claim brought by Mr Stephen Stamper against Datastor Systems Ltd. The Tribunal recorded that the respondent conceded the dismissal was unfair because the incorrect procedure had been applied. It also found that the reason for dismissal was redundancy and not a sham procedure, noting that there had been a takeover, changes to the business, and redundancies of other employees.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Remedy judgment only. The respondent conceded that the dismissal was unfair because the incorrect procedure was applied. The Tribunal found the dismissal was for redundancy rather than a sham procedure. | Upheld | — | £7,602 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,602
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,602
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.