Case 1301559/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A MacMillan, Counsel For the v Mr M Best, Chief Executive Officer, R2 — 2018
- Case reference
- 1301559/2018
- Decision date
- 9 January 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A MacMillan, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Gardner was at all relevant times an employee of the 1st respondent and that his employment ended by reason of redundancy on 9 January 2018. On that basis, it held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment.
The amount of the redundancy payment was assessed at £9,274.95. The judgment records that the 1st respondent was insolvent and that the 3rd respondent was liable to pay the redundancy payment to the claimant pursuant to ss.166 and 183 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The claim against the 2nd respondent did not proceed to a substantive determination. The tribunal noted that it was withdrawn and dismissed after the parties had concluded a COT3 settlement in relation to that part of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was at all relevant times an employee of the 1st respondent and had been dismissed for redundancy, with an effective date of termination of 9 January 2018. It held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £9,274.95, and that the 3rd respondent was liable to pay that sum pursuant to ss.166 and 183 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £9,275 |
| Redundancy | The claim against the 2nd respondent was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal, after the parties had concluded a COT3 settlement in respect of that part of the claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,275
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.166 ERA 1996
- s.183 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.