Case 1301584/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Wilshaw v Vodafone Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 1301584/2018
- Decision date
- 7 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Wilshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 11 July 2018 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the complaint of unfair dismissal should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal.
The judgment did not determine the claimant's remaining claim. It stated that the remaining claim stayed listed for a preliminary hearing for case management orders on 6 November 2018.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out only the complaint of unfair dismissal. It states that the claimant's remaining claim remained listed for a preliminary hearing, but does not adjudicate that remaining claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.