Case 1301602/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr D Cooper T/a Atmospheric Architecture — 2019
- Case reference
- 1301602/2018
- Decision date
- 1 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Birmingham hearing on 1 February 2019, before Employment Judge Lloyd, and in the respondent's absence, the tribunal upheld the claimant's claim of unauthorised deduction of wages. It found that wages had been unlawfully deducted for the period 19 February 2018 to 27 March 2018 and awarded the net sum of £1,203.61, payable forthwith. The tribunal recorded that it made no further award for holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of wages for 19 February 2018 to 27 March 2018 and awarded the net sum of £1,203.61. It made no further award for holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,204 |
| Other | The tribunal found the claimant had not been provided with a written statement of terms and conditions and awarded two weeks' pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £602 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,805
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.