Case 1301616/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Kennan, of counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1301616/2017
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean
- Panel members
- Mrs I Fox, Mr C Dodd
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr N Kennan, of counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Birmingham on 11 and 12 November 2019, before Employment Judge VC Dean sitting with Mrs I Fox and Mr C Dodd, the claimant withdrew her complaints of sex discrimination, maternity discrimination, victimisation, and automatic unfair dismissal. The tribunal therefore recorded the complaints as dismissed on withdrawal.
No findings were made on the merits of any of the withdrawn complaints, and no compensation or other substantive remedy was awarded. The written record also states that no order for costs was made.
The tribunal noted that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal recorded this complaint as dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal recorded this complaint as dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal recorded this complaint as dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The automatic unfair dismissal complaint under s.99 ERA 1996 and regulation 20(1) of the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999 was recorded as dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.18 Equality Act 2010
- s.27(1) Equality Act 2010
- s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 20(1) Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.