Case 1301644/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1301644/2023
- Decision date
- 19 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
- Panel members
- Mrs N Chavda, Mr S Woodall
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously dismissed all claims. The claimant’s disability discrimination complaint based on a failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed for want of jurisdiction under section 123 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal also dismissed the direct disability discrimination claim and the claim for discrimination for a reason arising in consequence of disability, stating that the respondent did not at any material time act in contravention of section 39 Equality Act 2010.
The wrongful dismissal claim was also dismissed. The tribunal found that the claimant had been lawfully dismissed in accordance with the terms of his employment contract. The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for disability discrimination by reason of the failure to make reasonable adjustments; dismissed for want of jurisdiction under section 123 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim of direct disability discrimination; the tribunal found the respondent did not at any material time act in contravention of section 39 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim of discrimination for a reason arising in consequence of disability; dismissed by the tribunal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was lawfully dismissed in accordance with the terms of his employment contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- section 39 Equality Act 2010
- section 120 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.