Case 1301656/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Makovicky v GXO Logistics UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1301656/2025
- Decision date
- 28 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Makovicky
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit of £250 per complaint following a preliminary hearing held on 28 November 2025. The order was sent to the claimant on 23 December 2025 and later varied by an order issued on 13 January 2026, extending time for payment until 4pm on 19 January 2026.
The claimant did not pay the deposits. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaints of discrimination on the grounds of belief, discrimination on the grounds of marriage, protected disclosures, and alleged contraventions of the Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklist) Regulations 2010 under rule 40(4) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The judgment describes this as discrimination on the grounds of marriage and strikes it out under rule 40(4) after non-payment of a deposit. | Struck out | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment describes this as discrimination on the grounds of belief and strikes it out under rule 40(4) after non-payment of a deposit. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as detriment and/or automatic unfair dismissal by reason of having made protected disclosures, and strikes it out under rule 40(4) after non-payment of a deposit. | Struck out | — | — |
| Trade union | The judgment describes this as alleged contraventions of the Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklist) Regulations 2010 and strikes it out under rule 40(4) after non-payment of a deposit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 40(4) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.