Case 1301662/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Miss O Mulvey v AMC UK Group Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2024

Case reference: 1301662/2023
Decision date: 2 February 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge V Jones Representation

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss O Mulvey

Respondent

AMC UK Group Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Miss O Mulvey brought complaints of direct sex discrimination and indirect sex discrimination against AMC UK Group Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation). The hearing took place on 30 January 2024 at Birmingham by Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge V Jones. The judgment records that the direct sex discrimination complaints under ss.13 and 39 Equality Act 2010 were dismissed, while the indirect sex discrimination complaint under ss.19 and 39 Equality Act 2010 succeeded.

The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £26,513.72, with interest included in that figure at £1,866.17. The schedule shows past loss of £10,676.80, future loss of £1,470.75, and injury to feelings of £12,500. A 25% uplift under s.207A TULR(C)A 1992 was applied to the relevant heads of loss. Interest on past loss was calculated at 8% from the midpoint under reg. 6(1)(b) of the Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases (Amendment) Regulations 2013, and interest on injury to feelings was calculated at 8% from 11 October 2022.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Sex discrimination	Direct sex discrimination contrary to s.13 and s.39 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed.	Dismissed	Sex	—
Sex discrimination	Indirect sex discrimination contrary to s.19 and s.39 Equality Act 2010 succeeded; the judgment then awarded compensation for the claim as a whole.	Upheld	Sex	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £26,514; across all upheld claims
Compensatory award: £12,148; compensatory remedy recorded

Legal tests applied

5 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.