Case 1301688/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Parry v Crispy Cod Ketley Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301688/2023
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Parry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that Mrs J Parry's claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unlawful deduction of wages, holiday pay, failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions, and failure to provide itemised pay statements all succeeded.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £437 and a compensatory award made up of £7,866 for 36 weeks' post-dismissal loss of earnings and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The tribunal added a 25% uplift because the respondent had failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.
The wrongful dismissal claim also succeeded. The tribunal recorded that two weeks' notice pay at £218.50 per week had been included in the unfair dismissal award and offset against that award, so no separate payment was ordered for the notice period. It separately ordered £48.50 for 5.1 hours' holiday pay accrued over the notice period.
The tribunal also ordered £266 for unpaid wages, made up of £133 for October 2022 and £133 for November 2022, £2,545.05 for holiday pay accrued and unpaid at termination, and £874 for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions. As to itemised pay statements, the tribunal made a declaration only that the respondent had failed to provide them in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records a total award of £14,628.50.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The award included a basic award of £437 and a compensatory award made up of £7,866 loss of earnings, £500 for loss of statutory rights, and a 25% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. | Upheld | — | £10,895 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The 2 weeks' notice pay was included in the unfair dismissal award and offset, so no separate payment was ordered for that element; the separate payment ordered under this head was £48.50 for 5.1 hours' holiday pay accrued over the notice period. | Upheld | — | £49 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | £133 was ordered for unpaid wages in October 2022 and £133 for unpaid wages in November 2022. | Upheld | — | £266 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay accrued and unpaid at the date of termination. | Upheld | — | £2,545 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions. | Upheld | — | £874 |
| Other | Declaration only that the respondent failed to give itemised pay statements in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,629
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £437
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £10,458
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.