Case 1301703/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr N Dunn (HR representative) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1301703/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Panel members
- Mrs D Rance, Mrs E Shenton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final merits hearing took place at Centre City Tower, Birmingham on 15-17 April 2024 before Employment Judge Perry sitting with Mrs D Rance and Mrs E Shenton. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr N Dunn, HR representative. The written record contains the tribunal's orders and does not set out detailed reasons.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the respondent did not contravene Part 5 Equality Act 2010 and did not fail to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The claimant's constructive unfair dismissal complaint was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The respondent agreed to pay £762 gross within 14 days. The complaint was adjourned for 14 days to allow those terms to be implemented, and the judgment stated that absent an application by either party on or before 8 May 2024 the complaint would stand dismissed on withdrawal. | Settled | — | £762 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's remaining unlawful deduction from wages complaints were dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £762
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.