Case 1301707/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Archbold v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2026
- Case reference
- 1301707/2025
- Decision date
- 25 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beck
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Archbold
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone hearing in Birmingham on 14 October 2025, Employment Judge Beck recorded that the claimant withdrew his complaints of redundancy payment, notice pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay and other payments. The judgment states that those complaints were dismissed following withdrawal. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made in relation to those complaints.
The judgment also records that the claimant withdrew his complaints of sexual orientation discrimination, religion or belief discrimination, race discrimination, marriage or civil partnership discrimination and sex discrimination. Those complaints were likewise dismissed following withdrawal. The judgment contains no merits analysis, no legal test discussion, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay complaint dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay and other payments complaint dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination recorded. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination recorded. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination recorded. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.