Case 1301712/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Mr. Hunt — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301712/2023
- Decision date
- 14 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Birmingham by CVP on 14 August 2023 before Employment Judge Wedderspoon. The first respondent’s name was amended from Wilson Lodge to Wilson Care Resources Limited. The claimant, Mr R Ottewell, appeared in person; Mr Hunt represented the first respondent and there was no attendance for the second respondent.
Judgment was entered for the claimant against the first named respondent, Wilson Care Resources Limited, in the total sum of £1,358.64. The second named respondent, Willing Care Recruitment Limited, was dismissed from the proceedings. The judgment does not set out any further findings or a separate breakdown of the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered for the claimant against the first named respondent, Wilson Care Resources Limited, in the total sum of £1,358.64. The second named respondent was dismissed from the proceedings. | Upheld | — | £1,359 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,359
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.