Case 1301746/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Pritchard v Carillion Integrated Services Ltd (in liquidation) Heard by Cloud Video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1301746/2017
- Decision date
- 21 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Pritchard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Reed, sitting by Cloud Video on 21 January 2021, recorded that the claimant, Mr J Pritchard, succeeded on his unfair dismissal claim against Carillion Integrated Services Ltd (in liquidation). The tribunal found that he was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £7,903.50.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to make a proper payment to the claimant for holiday accrued and untaken. It directed the respondent to pay £2,851.28 in respect of that holiday payment.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the extracted judgment records the outcomes and awards but not the tribunal's detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £7,903.50. | Upheld | — | £7,904 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to make a proper payment for holiday accrued and untaken and ordered payment of £2,851.28. | Upheld | — | £2,851 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,755
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,904
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.