Case 1301753/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sharon Grubb v Playstation Day Nursery Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301753/2023
- Decision date
- 7 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sharon Grubb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was entered in default under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time limit. On that basis, Employment Judge Perry made a judgment without a contested hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 17 August 2023.
The tribunal held that Mrs Sharon Grubb was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded her damages of £4,200 gross. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,475.
The total sum payable by the respondent was £10,675. The judgment records that it is for the claimant to account for any tax and employee national insurance on the sums above, or to make any pension contributions to a pension provider.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £4,200 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,200 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £6,475. | Upheld | — | £6,475 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,675
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.