Case 1301755/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Toon v Daisy Chains Cheadle Nursery Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301755/2022
- Decision date
- 5 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Toon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 30 March 2022 and sent to the respondent on 6 April 2022, then re-sent to the same registered office on 21 September 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the tribunal determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Daisy Chains Cheadle Nursery Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Miss Toon’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay the amount of those deductions, £754.65. The hearing listed for 13 January 2023 was cancelled. The judgment also noted company information suggesting the respondent would shortly be struck off and gave standard information about enforcement and possible insolvency-related recovery options.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £755 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £755
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.