Case 1301766/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person assisted by her brother Mr Wincott For the v Mr Kangaradnam (director) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301766/2023
- Decision date
- 21 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person assisted by her brother Mr Wincott For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final merits hearing took place on 21 August 2023 at Centre City Tower, Birmingham, before Employment Judge Perry sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person, assisted by her brother Mr Wincott, and the respondent was represented by Mr Kangaradnam, its director.
The judgment records that, by consent, it was agreed that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant £543.32 in relation to her holiday pay claim. On that basis, the holiday pay claim succeeded for the agreed sum.
The judgment does not record any separate award for basic award, compensatory award, injury to feelings, or interest, and it does not identify any additional live issues beyond the agreed holiday pay sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Determined by consent; the judgment records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant £543.32 in relation to holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £543 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £543
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.