Mr P Imuetiyan v Sunnyside Care Ltd — 2023

Case reference: 1301777/2023
Decision date: 23 August 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge V. Jones Representation

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P Imuetiyan

Respondent

Sunnyside Care Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found the claimant's claim well-founded and held that Sunnyside Care Ltd had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages contrary to section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996. The deductions comprised £209 for hours worked on 16 and 17 November 2022 and £13 agreed as the respondent's contribution towards travel expenses on 22 and 23 November 2022.

Under section 24 ERA 1996, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the total sum of £222 unlawfully deducted. The judgment does not record any separate interest award or other remedy.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages contrary to section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996. The award covered £209 for hours worked on 16 and 17 November 2022 and £13 agreed as the respondent's contribution to travel expenses on 22 and 23 November 2022.	Upheld	—	£222

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £222; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.