Case 1301788/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Iqra Janjua v The Marigold Facilities Management Limited Heard: Birmingham (via CVP) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1301788/2023
- Decision date
- 18 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Iqra Janjua
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Iqra Janjua succeeded on all four heads of claim against The Marigold Facilities Management Limited. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 February 2022 to 6 November 2022, subject to the stated exclusion of the week of 4 July 2022, and awarded £3,857.23 gross.
The tribunal also upheld the holiday pay complaint, finding that the respondent failed to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended, and awarded £1,165.65 as damages for breach of contract. The notice pay complaint was also upheld, with £570 awarded as breach of contract damages calculated by reference to gross pay.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and held that the respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015. It therefore increased the compensatory award by 25% under s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £570 and a compensatory award of £4,976.35, stated to include the uplift and compensation for loss of statutory rights. The total monetary award was £11,139.23.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 February 2022 to 6 November 2022, excluding the week of 4 July 2022. | Upheld | — | £3,857 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay holiday accrued but not taken when employment ended. The award was stated to be the net value due to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £1,166 |
| Breach of contract | This was the notice pay claim. The tribunal awarded damages calculated using gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £570 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair. It also increased the compensatory award by 25% because the respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015. | Upheld | — | £5,546 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,139
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £570
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,976
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.