Case 1301880/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person First v Mr S Willey (solicitor) Second respondent: Mr P Roberts (solicitor) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1301880/2018
- Decision date
- 29 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Anstis sitting alone in Birmingham on 29 April 2019. The claimant was represented in person, the first respondent by Mr S Willey and the second respondent by Mr P Roberts.
The only substantive order recorded in the extracted judgment is that the claimant’s claims against the second respondent were struck out. The extract does not state the detailed basis for that order, and it does not record any findings on liability as between the claimant and the first respondent.
On the material available here, the judgment is limited to the procedural disposal of the claims against the second respondent and contains no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The extract does not specify the basis of the strike-out or whether this claim was one of several claims against the second respondent, but the case listing identifies race discrimination as one of the claim categories. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extract does not set out the reasoning for the strike-out. The case listing identifies unfair dismissal as one of the claim categories. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.