Case 1301931/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Popovski v Staffordshire Leisure Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1301931/2022
- Decision date
- 17 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Popovski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 August 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr N Popovski an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 29 April 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Popovski did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Jones therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 23 August 2022 did not take place, and the judgment contains no determination of the underlying merits.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole for non-compliance and because it had not been actively pursued; no substantive merits were determined. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole for non-compliance and because it had not been actively pursued; the reasons do not separate the heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.