Case 1301940/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Afzal v Randstad Solutions Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301940/2022
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Afzal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the correct title of the Respondent was Randstad Solutions Limited.
All of the Claimant's claims against the Respondent were dismissed upon their withdrawal. The written judgment does not set out reasons on the merits or make findings about the underlying allegations.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal; it does not separately enumerate the claims in the written text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal but does not separately enumerate this claim. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal but does not separately enumerate this claim. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal but does not separately enumerate this claim. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.