Case 1301942/2017 · Employment Tribunal
in person v Mr M Maratos, consultant — 2019
- Case reference
- 1301942/2017
- Decision date
- 16 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham on 15 July 2019, Employment Judge Broughton recorded that the respondent conceded liability for the claimant's discrimination because of pregnancy / maternity claim and for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment. Both claims therefore succeeded. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr M Maratos, consultant.
The tribunal awarded 17 weeks' pay for financial loss at £115.20 per week, totalling £1,958.40, and £7,500 for injury to feelings on the pregnancy / maternity discrimination claim. It also awarded 2 weeks' pay, £230.40, for the failure to provide the written statement / contract. The total award was £9,688.80. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The respondent conceded liability in relation to the claimant's discrimination because of pregnancy / maternity claim. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £9,458 |
| Other | The respondent conceded liability for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment; the judgment also describes this as failure to provide a contract. | Upheld | — | £230 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,689
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,958
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.