Case 1301956/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Bawa v Trident Reach the People Charity (a company limited by guarantee) — 2017
- Case reference
- 1301956/2022
- Decision date
- 24 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mensah
- Venue
- Midlands West Tribunal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Bawa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote preliminary hearing on 11 May 2023, Employment Judge Mensah heard evidence from Mr A Bawa and submissions from both parties. The tribunal addressed disability status and related case-management issues, but it did not decide the substantive discrimination or constructive dismissal claims at that stage.
The tribunal found that Mr Bawa was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 because of the combined impact of Type 2 Diabetes, Ischemic Heart Disease and Gout. It held that those conditions together amounted to a physical impairment with a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. The tribunal also found that the relevant period covered the whole of his employment with the respondent up to 28 February 2022. It recorded that Gout was a recurring condition since 16 January 2006, Ischemic Heart Disease was lifelong and progressive, and Type 2 Diabetes had persisted since diagnosis on 8 July 2008.
No findings were made on the respondent's knowledge of the conditions, although the respondent accepted that Mr Bawa had all three. On the limited evidence available at this stage, the tribunal could not fairly decide whether the matters relied on formed a continuing course of conduct or whether individual events were out of time or should be struck out. It therefore left limitation, the distinction between the first and second ACAS certificates, and any question of extending time for the substantive hearing. The tribunal referred to HM Revenue & Customs v Garau and stated that its reasoning would not bind the later tribunal beyond the finding that Mr Bawa was disabled at the relevant time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found the claimant disabled within section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of Type 2 Diabetes, Ischemic Heart Disease and Gout, but made no final findings on substantive liability, limitation, continuing act, or any remedy. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- continuing course of conduct
- just and equitable to extend time
- HM Revenue & Customs v Garau
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.