Case 1301957/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Peermahomud v M6 Group of Companies Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301957/2022
- Decision date
- 19 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms J Peermahomud
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs J Peermahomud brought unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, sex discrimination and race discrimination complaints against M6 Group of Companies Ltd and Mr A Savery. The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the complaints because it found the unfair dismissal complaint was presented out of time and that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time, and/or it was not presented within such further time as the tribunal considered reasonable.
The tribunal also found that the disability, sex and race discrimination complaints were not presented in time. It decided that it was not just and equitable to extend time for those discrimination claims, so they were dismissed as well. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint was not presented in time, despite it being reasonably practicable to do so and/or not presented within such further time as the tribunal considered reasonable. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the disability discrimination complaint was not presented in time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal held that the sex discrimination complaint was not presented in time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held that the race discrimination complaint was not presented in time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.