Case 1301964/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Evans v Winner Recruitment (Birmingham) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1301964/2019
- Decision date
- 3 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Hughes recorded that the respondent had not presented a response. The tribunal therefore entered judgment on the claimant's claims and ordered the respondent to pay £250.00 for an unpaid bonus and £254.78 for unpaid holiday entitlement.
The judgment does not set out further factual findings or legal analysis beyond those two unpaid sums. No separate split of the awards by statutory head is given in the text, and no additional remedy components such as interest or compensation are recorded. The bottom-line amount ordered by the tribunal is £504.78.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The rule 21 judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's bonus and ordered payment of £250.00. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Working time regulations | The rule 21 judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £254.78. | Upheld | — | £255 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £505
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.