Case 1301965/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Gawlik v A.I.M Logistics Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1301965/2019
- Decision date
- 14 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Gawlik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Gawlik withdrew the claim against A.i.m. Logistics Limited. The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following that withdrawal under rule 52 on 14 August 2019.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the claim and records no financial award. It is a procedural disposal only, with no remedy section or compensation calculation in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only that the claim was withdrawn and the proceedings were dismissed; the claim type is taken from the case listing/context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the claim was withdrawn and the proceedings were dismissed; the claim type is taken from the case listing/context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records only that the claim was withdrawn and the proceedings were dismissed; the claim type is taken from the case listing/context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.