Case 1302008/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Cian McCourt v Gradwell Communications Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1302008/2022
- Decision date
- 31 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mensah
- Venue
- Birmingham West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Cian McCourt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Claimant's claims for unauthorised deduction of wages were made out against Gradwell Communications Limited. The written judgment records two components of the award: £656.41 deducted from the final salary for a damaged laptop, and £3,065.52 in outstanding commission.
The total sum ordered to be paid to the Claimant was £3,721.93. The decision was given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not provide further reasons beyond the finding that the claims succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal upheld the claim(s) for unauthorised deduction of wages and ordered repayment of £656.41 for a deduction in the final salary relating to a damaged laptop and £3,065.52 for outstanding commission, totalling £3,721.93. | Upheld | — | £3,722 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,722
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.