Case 1302016/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Holding v Homeserve Membership Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1302016/2022
- Decision date
- 2 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Platt REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Holding
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public heard by CVP at Midlands West on 2 February 2024, the claimant did not attend and the respondent was represented by counsel. Employment Judge Platt recorded that the Tribunal made reasonable enquiries regarding the claimant's non-attendance pursuant to Employment Tribunal Rule 47.
The Tribunal struck out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(c) because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal Rules or a Tribunal order, and under Rule 37(1)(d) because the claim had not been actively pursued. The written judgment does not set out separate determinations of the substantive claims listed elsewhere for the case.
The hearing listed for 1 to 3 May 2024 was vacated. No remedy or monetary award was recorded, as the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' but does not identify the individual substantive causes of action in the written record. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(c)
- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(d)
- Employment Tribunal Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.