Case 1302037/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wallace - Counsel For the v Miss N Owen - Counsel — 2020
- Case reference
- 1302037/2019
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wallace - Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Birmingham on 22 and 23 January 2020, with Employment Judge Self sitting alone. The claimant, Mr S Poole, was represented by Mr J Wallace of counsel and the respondent, Conveyor Units Limited, was represented by Miss N Owen of counsel.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages. It declared that position and ordered the respondent to pay £856.11 as a net sum after appropriate tax and national insurance deductions had been made.
The claims for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were each found to be not well-founded and were dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded on those dismissed claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared unlawful deductions from wages and ordered payment of £856.11 as a net sum after appropriate tax and national insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £856 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £856
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.