Case 1302039/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Hamilton v Mr C Turnock t/a Take a Break Heard — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302039/2022
- Decision date
- 5 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Members
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs Hill, Mr Deneen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Hamilton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss T Hamilton brought a complaint of pregnancy discrimination against Mr C Turnock t/a Take a Break. The tribunal, sitting at Birmingham before Employment Judge Hindmarch with Mrs Hill and Mr Deneen as members, found that the complaint of pregnancy discrimination was well founded and upheld it.
After the liability decision was given, the parties reached settlement terms in private. The tribunal stayed the proceedings until August 2024 for those terms to be met, and recorded that the proceedings would be dismissed on 31 August 2024 unless the claimant informed the tribunal that the terms had not been met. The extracted judgment does not record any separate monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of pregnancy discrimination is well founded and is upheld. No separate remedy figure is recorded in the extracted text. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.