Case 1302042/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Preston v The Imperial Bathroom Company Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1302042/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Preston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Butler issued a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52 dated 7 March 2020. The extracted decision records that the proceedings in case 1302042/2019, brought by Mr L Preston against The Imperial Bathroom Company Limited, were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The judgment does not set out any findings on the merits of the underlying complaints and does not record any award of compensation or other remedy. On the extracted text available, the tribunal's decision was limited to disposing of the proceedings after withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Claim type inferred from the case context listing. The extracted judgment text itself only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim and does not separate outcomes by complaint. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type inferred from the case context listing. The extracted judgment text itself only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim and does not separate outcomes by complaint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.