Case 1302043/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302043/2022
- Decision date
- 30 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 30 January 2023, Employment Judge Perry, sitting alone in Birmingham, considered the claimant's disability discrimination complaints and unfair dismissal complaint against Jaguar Land Rover Limited. The tribunal recorded that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the claimant's disability discrimination complaints were not presented in time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint was not presented in time, that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, and alternatively that it was not presented within a further reasonable period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- just and equitable
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.