Case 1302048/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Andrea Hutchings v Pin-Point Recruitment Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1302048/2022
- Decision date
- 8 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Knowles
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Andrea Hutchings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge L Knowles on 8 November 2022, heard evidence from the claimant, Mrs Andrea Hutchings, and from Mr Jukes for the respondent, and considered the documents provided. The respondent's correct name was amended by consent to Pin-Point Recruitment Ltd.
The claimant's sole claim was for unlawful deductions from wages in relation to a bonus payment of £500. The Tribunal found that claim well founded and awarded her £500, described as the gross sum due. The judgment also ordered that the respondent pay the compensation as a gross sum and make the appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance, providing the claimant with details of those deductions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found the claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages in respect of a £500 bonus payment was well founded and awarded the gross sum due. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.