Mr R Duxbury v Sertec — 2020

Case reference: 1302053/2019
Decision date: 19 February 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Lloyd

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr R Duxbury

Respondent

Sertec

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, remedy, or contested issues beyond that procedural disposal. The case is identified in the listing as an unfair dismissal matter, but the judgment text itself only records withdrawal and dismissal of the proceedings.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.