Case 1302066/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Louise Davey v Alliance in Partnership — 2022
- Case reference
- 1302066/2022
- Decision date
- 13 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bennett Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Louise Davey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Louise Davey, brought a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages against Alliance in Partnership. She did not attend the remote hearing on 13 July 2022, having told the tribunal that morning that she would not be attending, and Judge Bennett proceeded in her absence under Rule 47. The tribunal considered the written material submitted by the claimant, including an email explaining why the claim had been lodged late.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s employment ended on 31 August 2021 and that, under s23(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the relevant deadline for presenting the claim or starting ACAS early conciliation was 30 November 2021. The claimant did not contact ACAS or the tribunal until 12 April 2022, more than four months late. The judge accepted that she had tried to resolve matters informally with the respondent, but noted that she had not raised a formal grievance and had known about the unpaid overtime issue for a significant period.
The tribunal concluded that the claim was significantly out of time and that it had not been shown that it was not reasonably practicable for the complaint to be presented within the relevant period. The judge also found that the claimant could reasonably have contacted her union representative earlier and would likely have become aware of the time limits. The claim was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction, regardless of any substantive merit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed as out of time under s23(2) ERA 1996. The tribunal found the claim was presented more than four months after the relevant deadline and that it was open to the claimant to take earlier steps to check what was required, including by contacting her union representative. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s23(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.