Case 1302078/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Williams v Jude Polack, Trading North Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1302078/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hussain Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hussain, sitting at Midlands West on 26 July 2022, found that Jude Polack, Trading North Ltd breached contract by dismissing Miss H Williams without notice. The tribunal ordered damages of £1,600 net, payable by 23 August 2022.
The tribunal also held that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages by failing to pay the claimant her full salary for the period 01 January 2022 to 07 February 2022. It ordered payment of £972.10 net and directed the respondent to account to HMRC for any tax and NI due.
In addition, the tribunal declared that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of particulars upon the claimant's promotion from 01 October 2021 and ordered £744.20. It further declared a failure to provide itemised pay statements from September 2021 to February 2022, but recorded that no further loss could be quantified and therefore made no award on that point.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached contract by dismissing the claimant without notice and ordered £1,600 net damages payable by 23 August 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages because the claimant was not paid her full salary from 01 January 2022 to 07 February 2022. The respondent was ordered to pay £972.10 net and account to HMRC for any tax and NI due. | Upheld | — | £972 |
| Other | The tribunal declared that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of particulars upon promotion from 01 October 2021 and ordered £744.20 payable by 23 August 2022. | Upheld | — | £744 |
| Other | The tribunal declared that the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements from September 2021 to February 2022, but found no further loss could be quantified and made no award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,316
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.