Case 1302082/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr A. MacMillan - Counsel — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302082/2023
- Decision date
- 8 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy K.C
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham by CVP on 8 December 2023, Employment Judge Algazy KC recorded that the parties had agreed terms of settlement in cases 1302082/2023 and 1303611/2022 between Mr Darren Richardson, Mr Andrew Parry, and Müller UK & Ireland Group LLP. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on liability.
The tribunal ordered that both cases be stayed for 14 days, until 12.00 p.m. on 22 December 2023, for implementation of the settlement. It further stated that, unless an application was made to relist the matter, the claim would be dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimants on 22 December 2023. No remedy figures or apportionment were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed. It does not set out any merits findings or a separate monetary award for this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed. It does not set out any merits findings or a separate monetary award for this claim. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.