Case 1302085/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr S Oliver (Director) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302085/2023
- Decision date
- 18 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Birmingham video hearing on 18 September 2023, Employment Judge Emery found three claims well founded and three claims not well founded. The successful claims were for one week’s notice pay, one day’s pay wrongly deducted from final wages as overpayment of holiday pay, and one day’s pay for the claimant’s last day of employment on 23 January 2023. The tribunal rejected the claims for 2.5 days’ pay said to have been lawfully deducted as holiday overpayment, one day’s pay for working the August bank holiday, and one week’s additional wages.
In the remedy judgment, the tribunal awarded £500 for one week’s pay in lieu of notice, £100 for 23 January 2023, and £100 for one day’s holiday pay, described as including the additional day rate and less tax and NI approximately. The total due was £700.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | One week’s notice pay. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | One day’s pay wrongfully deducted from final wages as overpayment of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £100 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | One day’s pay for last day of employment, 23 January 2023. | Upheld | — | £100 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | 2.5 days’ pay which were said to have been lawfully deducted from final wages as overpayment of holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | One day’s pay for working August bank holiday; the judgment does not specify a distinct statutory label for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | One week’s additional wages; the judgment does not specify a distinct statutory label for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.