Case 1302102/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Alesali v Extra Personnel Limited trading as jobsandtalent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1302102/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr Stanley, Ms Stewart
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Alesali
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham on 29 February, 1 and 4 March 2024 before Employment Judge Flood, with Mr Stanley and Ms Stewart sitting as the non-legal members. The claimant, Mr S Alesali, was represented by his sister and lay representative, and the respondent, Extra Personnel Limited trading as jobsandtalent, was represented by a solicitor.
The Tribunal unanimously held that the complaints of unfair dismissal under section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996 and discrimination arising from a disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 were not well founded and were dismissed. The written record states that the reasons for the judgment were given in full orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.