Case 1302115/2022 · Employment Tribunal
PIOTR PASEWICZ v T33 Holdings Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1302115/2022
- Decision date
- 26 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge MANLEY Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
PIOTR PASEWICZ
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge Manley, sitting at Birmingham remotely by CVP on 26 September 2022, entered judgment for the claimant on all recorded heads of claim.
The tribunal found that the respondent was in breach of contract for failing to pay the claimant's fuel expenses incurred in the course of employment, and awarded damages of £562.66. It also found a breach of regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 in relation to 7.06 holiday pay in lieu, with damages of £767.39 net under regulation 30(3)(b).
The tribunal further found that the respondent was in breach of contract and had made an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 by failing to pay the claimant for hours worked. Damages of £4,000.45 net were awarded for that item. The judgment records a total sum payable of £5,330.50 net.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay the claimant's fuel expenses incurred in the course of his employment. | Upheld | — | £563 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found a breach of regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for failing to pay 7.06 holiday pay in lieu; the award was stated as net and made under regulation 30(3)(b). | Upheld | — | £767 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract and had made an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 by failing to pay the claimant for hours worked. The award was stated as net; the judgment did not split this sum between the contract and wages findings. | Upheld | — | £4,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,331
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 30(3)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.